CONSENT CALENDAR |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
10. |
RECEIVE
SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT |
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Meeting Date: |
August 16, 2004 |
Budgeted: |
Yes |
|
|||
|
|
||||||
From: |
David A. Berger, |
Program/ |
2.6 Hydrologic
Monitoring |
||||
|
General Manager |
Line Item No.: |
2-6-1 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Prepared By: |
Tom Lindberg |
Cost Estimate: |
N/A |
|
|||
General Counsel Approval: |
N/A |
|
|||||
Committee
Recommendation: |
N/A |
|
|||||
CEQA Compliance: |
N/A |
|
|||||
SUMMARY: Water quality results from the Spring 2004 sampling of the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District’s (District) well network in the Carmel Valley aquifer are presented in Exhibit 10-A and briefly summarized below. Results from Spring 2003 are also provided for comparison.
RECOMMENDATION: Because there have not been significant changes, and because all constituents of concern are well below State Drinking Water Standards, no action is necessary at this time. Staff recommends approval of this item with adoption of the Consent Calendar.
BACKGROUND: From
the 1981 inception of the District’s ground water quality monitoring program
through 1994, the District worked cooperatively with the Monterey County Water
Resources Agency (MCWRA), which provided data collection and analysis services
to the District. However, in 1995 the
District assumed all field data collection responsibilities and now works
directly with the Monterey County Consolidated Chemistry Lab to conduct the
water quality analyses, as a cost saving measure.
As part of the District’s Strategic Plan
development, the District conducted an assessment of the ground water quality
monitoring program in 1996. As a
result, it was determined that some modifications could be made to the sampling
schedules in both the Carmel Valley and Seaside Basins without compromising the
effectiveness of the program.
Accordingly, collection of samples from the Carmel Valley monitor wells
has been reduced from semi-annual to annual.
The sampling schedule for Carmel Valley is staggered, with upper valley
wells (i.e., upgradient of the Narrows), sampled in Spring and lower Carmel
Valley wells in Fall, coinciding with the historically higher nitrate
concentrations in these respective areas.
Collection of samples from the Seaside Basin monitor wells was also
reduced to once per year in Fall, coinciding with the historically low water
levels in the basin at this time of the year.
This sampling reduction resulted in an approximate annual savings of
$4,000 in laboratory costs for the program.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Carmel Valley Aquifer Monitor Wells - Results from the Spring 2004 and Spring 2003
samplings are provided in Exhibit 10-A. Three shallow monitor wells in the upper
Carmel Valley are sampled each Spring, as per the sampling modification
described above. The locations of these
sampling points are shown on the map in Exhibit
10-B. Review of these water
quality results indicates no significant change in overall water quality in
Spring 2004 compared to samples collected in Spring 2003. Although the
Practical Quantification Limit (PQL) for two constituents, Iron and Manganese,
was reduced to 0.001 milligrams per liter (mg/l), none was detected in any of
the samples from Spring 2004. Potassium
concentrations were unexplainably higher in two of the wells (16S/2E-33Q1 and
17S/2E-10B1), but there is no California Title 22 Drinking Water Standard for
Potassium. Historically, Potassium levels were higher in 2002 and 2001, so
there is no cause for concern. All
constituents for which Drinking Water Standards exist are within acceptable
limits.
It should be noted that relatively high nitrate
concentrations (up to 22 milligrams per liter [mg/L]) were measured earlier in
two upper Carmel Valley monitor wells in Spring 1998, although the observed
nitrate concentrations were well below the drinking water standard of 45 mg/L. The Carmel Valley Master Plan established an
“action level” of 25 mg/l of nitrate due to concern about the limitations of
septic systems in this unsewered portion of Carmel Valley. The relatively high
readings were attributed to the flushing effect of severe storm events in the
Winter of 1998. Results of more recent
samplings from all three shallow wells indicate that nitrate concentrations
have returned to more normal levels.
10-A Ground Water Quality Monitoring Results for Spring 2004 and Spring 2003
10-B Map of Monitor Well Locations in Upper Carmel Valley
U:\staff\word\boardpacket\2004\2004boardpacket\20040816\ConsentCalendar\10\item10.doc